|
page 13 of 15
The Cosmic Expansion of Light
by Maria
in 15 Jul 2008
 (...previous)
For example, the Light for a new Manvantara, or a new cycle of life, seems us the cause, being the explosion and the expansion its effect, but the cause is in fact previous, as it was the matter in restraint that produced the Light. Thus, there are such unperceivable and subtle passages from one form to another that it becomes difficult to distinguish and to know the beginning of the chain of action.
Hubble’s Law
And the deviation towards red
Hubble, born in the USA in 1889, has made the charts of the locations and distributions of galaxies throughout the Universe. The distance of a galaxy would be proportional to its deviation velocity towards red. The farther the galaxy, the more deviated its luminosity, its lines of absorption and its spectrum towards red would be. It would suffice to consider a spectrum, to measure the deviation towards red and to multiply it by a simple numerical constant in order to obtain the Cosmic distance.
But what does this prove? That the Universe is expanding? Does it date its beginning or even the age of the galaxies? The deviation towards red is in fact the key to the measurements of the Universe? The deviation towards red of a Galaxy is in fact proportional to its distance from us?
Many scientific conclusions in the last decades may be wrong due to the excess of confidence placed on Hubble’s Law. This almost conventional interpretation of the Cosmos is as distorted and incomplete as the image of the Solar System centuries ago, whereby planet Earth was considered the centre of the Universe (Copernicus). However, we accept as correct the idea that galaxies constitute the Universe’s basic unit on a large scale…
In the theories of an expanding Universe, the idea of the deviation towards red, or light’s deviation towards longer wavelengths in distant galaxies, assumes a wide and powerful meaning: it is the prime point of reference for time and distance. However, the fact that the light from a galaxy reaches us with a deviation towards red is not necessarily a sign of an expanding Universe. The more the galaxies move away, the less probable a conclusion regarding the deviation towards red, as they move away from the parameters that we know or that we believe or have as certain regarding gravity and relativity. Also, when there is a powerful gravitational field, there can be a deviation towards red. For instance, certain stars have to fight so much against gravity when the light tries to escape from their surface that it ends up coming out with a deviation towards red. Light can not be stopped, but it can loose energy and end up leaving the surface with a deviation towards red, exhibiting a weak light.
The light emitted by a galaxy is somehow deviated towards red by the distance and movement which separates us, but above all, by the quality or degree of evolution of the Universes within it, and within a certain “limit” conferred to the Universes that move around themselves, and not in an unlimited space, as if drifting. Cosmos “spins”. The reason why galaxies move away from us at great velocity, may be due to the alteration in the constant of gravity or because they are older. It is due to the lack knowledge of certain values of gravity and to the great distances between Earth and the galaxies, which can move freely, that their image moving away comes to our sight. In reality, we are also included in a part of the Cosmos, in movement, conditioned by the law of gravity-relativity, which is caused by the agglomeration of existing matter, because the more matter there is, the more density and attraction exists. However, if we conceive - only as a background framework - the law of gravity as harmonizing the celestial bodies, we will have a limited and non-expansive space, as an unlimited expansion would result in a chaos of floating celestial bodies, and the law of gravity would fall down. There may be other laws and other types of matter that justify the isolation of the galaxies yet unknown to man.
(... next) |
